Banking apps seem to be a motif among things that don’t play well with privacy ROMs. My bank’s website does everything I could want out of it. I think I might be ignorant to something.

  • What about banking apps is especially compelling?
  • How often do banks put must-have features behind an app?
  • And should I be concerned that banks might move away from offering services through browsers?
    • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      173 months ago

      Can’t do anything about mobile deposits, but for notifications, you could get the notifications emailed to you and your email app has push notifications.

      • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        I mean, they could offer it through the browser. All modern browsers have more than enough hooks and permissions control to do something as simple as take a couple pictures and make a basic request to a back end.

        Though making nice things costs money, so…

        • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Oh, of course they could do so, but they won’t do it because they want you to use their app. They want you to use their app because they control it and can mine data from it more so than on a web browser. Take Cime, for example. It has all kinds of Google trackers in it.

        • @adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          i worked on someone’s laptop recently that was set up for mobile deposits via web browser. they also had a bank-provided scanner, too, that worked with it. so it is possible, and it is being done.

      • @QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Depends on the bank and what kind of notifications you want.
        Some banks only allow certain types of notifications to occur through the app.

      • lazynooblet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        I wouldn’t want bank notifications emailed to me. Maybe a notification that I have a notification, but no real content. Email is incredibly insecure.

        • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Yeah, that’s a good point. Although I don’t know of many banks that would send the actual notification through email, just a message that you have a notification.

  • @Grippler@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    173 months ago

    It’s a must for me. My phone is my primary day-to-day computer, so I need to be able to so everything from that. Unfortunately that is also why I’m not using graphene OS, because our government 2FA system doesn’t work in graphene OS (even with play services installed) so it’s impossible to do anything. I can’t check anything WRT banking, schools, taxes, daycare, doctors appointments, hospital record or change anything that requires the involvement of city hall, including checking digital mail from the municipality or government. It’s basically not possible to function in our society without it.

    • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      Out of curiosity, what do older citizens do? Like those in their 80s? Many here do not have a smart phone or mobile.

      • @Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        For banking and other official business, they have to go physically. If their bank has no physical department near them well then it sucks to be them. For digital mail you can apply for exemption and you will get physical letters.

        You can order a digital code generator so you don’t need the app if you still want 2FA for digital handling. But I don’t want to have to carry that with me it would be a significant inconvenience for me.

          • @Grippler@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I mean, it’s been 15+ years since smartphones hit the market as a regular device, so those people where only in their mid/late 60’s when that transition happened. And there are solutions in place for both digital access without smartphone and physical only access. I’m not sure I see how that is hostile to elderly or people that can’t/won’t use a smartphone or insist on physical access. Obviously physical access is going to be a hassle, that’s why it’s not the default anymore.

        • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Wow, that is pretty hostile to the elderly. Imagine those who struggle to get about? Excluding them from society.

  • @wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    173 months ago

    My bank’s app has way less functionality than the web version, but it’s used as a second factor to auth some operations, so I have to use both.

  • @radamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    Depends on the country. I’m teaching in Thailand and here you can’t do any banking through a browser. You can only use the bank’s official app and you don’t even have a login/password for it, you have to go to the bank and activate the app in person as a foreigner (I think Thai citizens can do it online but foreigners have to do it in person). Nobody takes actual cards for the payment and you pay everywhere by scanning QR codes which has to be done through the app. If you buy a new phone you have to activate the app again at the bank’s office. It’s really annoying and the reason I probably can’t go with GrapheneOS or any other custom roms because the bank app is absolutely essential.

  • @Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    113 months ago

    Mobile check deposit is the only thing I want from my bank’s app.

    I’m running LineageOS with Magisk and Play Integrity Fix. That works for my bank’s app, but I’m annoyed that they make me do it and gave their app a 1-star review on Google Play for it.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    103 months ago

    I don’t like smartphone and won’t use apps for anything important.

    • Bob
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Could you elaborate? What kind of phone do you have and do you use a free messaging application like Whatsapp?

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        i have an android for work and I just have the work stuff on it. personally I use google voice.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    Apparently US apps suck since our system is a dinosaur.

  • @rutrumA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    Cashing checks and zelle are the big ones

    • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      Zelle is sketchy even when compared to other cash transfer apps. They do a lot of freezing people’s money. Don’t use them if you have any other option.

    • Brickfrog
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      Same here, mobile check deposit and Zelle are literally the only things I’ve ever needed a bank app for.

      I used to never use Zelle for anything but too many friends/family want to use some sort of app for exchanging money & that’s usually what we settle on. And my old landlord wanted rent paid via Zelle so that was another thing that forced me to install a bank app for Zelle purposes.

      Mobile check deposit is a requirement when dealing with a bank without any locations nearby. In practice I only need to use that once a year or so, checks are kind of rare nowadays unless you’re a business owner with clients/customers paying with checks.

    • @Dymonika@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      For some banks, like Ally, you don’t need the app to transact in Zelle. But yeah, I must have one for check-depositing.

  • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93 months ago

    Usually not worth it, the website usually has everything.

    I’ve been surprised by how many banking apps I’ve seen that don’t require safteynet or google services (I thought basically all of them would require it). Some banks websites don’t work very well on mobile, so that’s some peoples reasoning.

  • @infeeeee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    My bank’s 2FA works only via their app or via SMS. For SMS I would have to pay per each received SMS.

    The app perfectly works without safetynet, with microG, rooted with magisk but hidden by zygisk, so I’m lucky. At one update they added a popup at start after login about asking to add my card to Google Wallet (or whatever it’s called nowadays), and it’s not implemented in MicroG, so I can’t open it since that version. I just downgraded to the last working version and blacklisted its upgrades in Aurora, and I hope they won’t block my old version in the near future.

    It’s a very progressive small local bank, I will contact them about this issue if they block my old version to make that dialog optional.

  • @MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    My bank doesn’t have a website and it makes me want to kill them.

    It’s crazy that it’s even legal to only have an app

  • MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    In Finland, extremely.

    The banks here provide digital ID verification online. You use it to log into tax services, the national health-care database, to apply for schools, other education-related stuff, apply for welfare, register trade names… etc. The list goes on and on.

    Stuff you’d otherwise have to personally visit or mail documents to offices of various government institutions for, can be done extremely smoothly online.

    With my bank, the app is used for one of the verification steps. When verifying your identity online, you need to authorize the login from the app by entering a PIN from memory when prompted. There are alternatives but this is by far the most convenient.

    The same banking app also notifies me the second any money comes into or leaves any of my accounts. No transactions can occur without my knowing. It lets me know when I receive my pay, or when an electronic invoice comes in (power, phone bills, etc. come right into the app), gets automatically paid, or when explicit authorization is needed due to one being irregular.

    Most of the services my bank provides can be accessed via browser, but the stuff above is the kind you can’t achieve in a browser.

    Honestly OP Pohjolas app is so feature-rich I’ve been able to pretty much set it up to run my finances for me. All I do is keep an eye on my accounts to make sure things are going right.

    • @reboot6675@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      I remember when I got here it was a nightmare for the first few months when I didn’t have strong auth. It took several months to open a bank account and you basically can’t do anything without that stuff

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Pretty much. Helping my grandmother deal with misplacing or forgetting her login details has been hell a couple times.

        It’s extremely convenient when just go about your life with it already on hand, but for obvious reasons the security measures are extreme and it’s a pain to set up or recover your id.

  • D61 [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    Depositing checks is about the only useful thing I’ve seen on my local bank’s app, but that only matters if you do business stuff with people who pay with checks.

  • @communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t use them. Web banking works completely fine for me. Back when I did use them, though, I always used them on privacy ROMs/GOS specifically. Went through 4 different banks and all their apps worked fine for me on GrapheneOS. No Google Play services either.